GRANDVIEW CITY COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 20, 2007
Mayor Norm Childress
called the study session to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at
City Hall.
Present were:
Mayor Childress and Councilmembers Helen Darr, Bill Flory, Pam
Horner, Jan McDonald and Javier Rodriguez.
Councilmembers Joan Souders and Robert Morales were absent.
Staff present were:
City Administrator Scott D. Staples, City Attorney Jack Maxwell, City
Clerk Anita Palacios and City Treasurer John Myers.
2.
5-YEAR FINANCIAL FORECAST
B CURRENT
EXPENSE FUND
City Treasurer Myers
explained that in 2005, a 6-Year Budget Estimate & Forecast worksheet was
developed and presented to the City Council.
That worksheet was included as Attachment E in the 2007 Budget
Message. He distributed a
modified worksheet illustrating a 5-year forecast of Current Expense Fund
budget estimates, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein
as part of these minutes. The
worksheet included 2006 Actual Revenues and Expenditures, the 2007 Adopted
Budget and estimated budgets for 2008 through 2012. After the entry of
figures for 2006 and 2007 these were compared with historical data.
From this information, estimated growth percentage numbers were
developed for each major revenue type and expenditure group.
The estimated growth percentages were used to calculate changes over
the next five years. Given the
current estimates, the Current Expense fund would continue to experience
expenditure increases greater than increases in resources.
The fund balance would decrease.
It was noted that Attachment B in the 2007 Budget Message represents
approximately $250,000 in expenditure reductions necessary to balance the
2007 budget. While some of the
items listed would be funded by Real Estate Excise Taxes from the Capital
Improvements Fund, many of the items listed would continue to be needs seen
by department heads necessary to deliver the current level of services to
the citizens of Grandview. To sustain the current level of service delivery
and programs provided in our community there would need to be an increase in
revenues or a means of delivering current services at a lower cost, or a
combination of increased resources and reduced costs.
In order to meet our mission statement of creating a
AFinancially
Sustainable City@,
he recommended that the 5-Year Forecast be reviewed and serve as a catalyst
for discussion and action regarding the City=s
plan to deliver services to the citizens of Grandview.
Discussion took place
regarding options available to raise additional revenue to maintain the
current level of service in the Current Expense Fund.
City Administrator
Staples identified the following legislation currently being proposed that
might provide the City with additional flexibility to raise revenues:
_
Eliminating
Non-Supplanting Language in Voter-Approved Funding Sources
B SB 5498
would eliminate the non-supplanting language in the voter-approved levy lid
lift and voter-approved sales tax.
_
Transportation Benefit
Districts (TBDs)
B
HB1858/SB 5767 would permit the establishment of TBDs , which would provide
cities with the opportunity to reinstate transportation funds lost due to
I-776.
_
Criminal Justice Funding
B HB 1851
would provide the City with the authority to impose a local sales and use
tax for criminal justice purposes.
In addition, City
Administrator reiterated the following revenue enhancements outlined in the
2007 budget message:
_
Voter approved utility
tax on private utilities (1% increase = $150,000)
_
Council approved utility
tax on public utilities (1% increase = $75,000)
Following discussion, it
was the consensus of Council to research the possibility of implementing a
1% tax increase on city utility services (water, sewer and garbage).
Staff was instructed to
determine the amount of funds a 1% increase would generate and the impact to
the utility billing customer. A
public hearing would be scheduled to receive comments.
City Administrator
Staples advised that he had been contacted by a utility customer who
inquired regarding the grace period allowed for delinquent accounts and how
the policy was established. The
utility customer also expressed concern that the notice of disconnection did
not provide a time in which payment would be due by in order to avoid
disconnection.
GMC Section 13.28.140(C)
B provides
in part
AThe
delinquent balance plus the $5.00 24-hour notice of disconnection fee must
be paid in full on the due date stated on said notice in order that the
water services remain on.@
Past practice has been
that if the due date fell on a Friday, any payments received in the drop box
over the weekend would be credited to the account and the water would not be
disconnected on the following Monday morning.
City Administrator
Staples suggested that the code be modified to provide that payments must be
paid in full by 5:00 p.m. on the due date stated on said notice.
In this case, should the due date fall on a Friday, any payments
received over the weekend would not be credited to the account and
disconnection would continue to take place.
Council concurred.
The study session
adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
__________________________
__________________________
Mayor Norm Childress
Anita Palacios, City Clerk